Channel 5 Register | Sign in |
 
 

Volkswagen FoxApril 2006

Average.

Both bigger and cheaper than the Lupo it replaces, the Fox offers plenty of VW for your cash. It's just a pity it's not more exciting.

Our rating:

3

User rating:

3_5
Volkswagen Fox
 
 

Fifth Gear Volkswagen Fox review

 
 
1. Size
2. Price of the basic version
3. VW badge

WE DON'T LIKE

1. Bland styling
2. Boring driving dynamics
3. Aircon only available as an expensive option
 
 

It lacks the character of some of its rivals, but it's not hard to make a thoroughly rational case for the Fox. Not only is it one of the biggest of the current crop of city cars, it's also well-constructed, competitively priced and - most importantly - wearing a VW badge.

The bland styling feels like a slightly wasted opportunity, with the Fox possessing none of the cheeky charm of its Lupo predecessor. Nose heavy proportions and a high ride height add to its rather ungainly appearance - especially on the small steel wheels of the more basic versions.

Fortunately it possesses an impressively large and well-finished cabin. Front seat space is excellent, with both occupants enjoying plenty of head- and shoulder-room, while the rear seats are big for the segment, too - more than up to handling larger passengers. In "Urban" trim the rear seat slides to free up even more space, or alternatively to increase luggage space in the decently-proportioned boot.

On the road the Fox is competent - if distinctly lacking in excitement. The basic 1.2 litre three-cylinder petrol engine sounds nice but delivers very limited performance, with low gearing making for loud, buzzy cruising at anything above urban speeds. The more expensive 1.4 four-cylinder petrol motor is far punchier - but it also suffers from relatively poor refinement, with lots of road noise getting into the cabin. The pliant ride is up to dealing with urban undulations, but it quickly feels floatey on bumpy country roads. Grip levels are unexceptional and the Fox understeers determinedly at the limit.

Entry level pricing is very keen, although the Fox looks relatively expensive further up the range - with aircon a pricey option.

Fifth Gear overall car ratings

STYLING

It's hard not to be disappointed by the Fox's dull, generic styling - especially as the Lupo was so cute.

HANDLING

Indifferent dynamics discourage keen progress. For excitement, look elsewhere.

COMFORT

The suspension is decently pliant over rougher roads, and a wide range of driving position adjustment means than almost anyone will fit.

QUALITY & RELIABILITY

Impressively solid-feeling compared to class rivals. The tough feeling cabin is well designed and shares many components with the Polo. Built in Brazil, but well up to European standards.

PERFORMANCE

Basic 1.2 litre three-cylinder engine is almost painfully slow. The 1.4 has decent urge, but both really lack refinement at speed. There is no diesel option.

ROOMINESS

Impressively large for a city car, both passengers and luggage enjoy plenty of room - and the optional sliding rear seat is a great idea.

STEREO / SAT NAV

The standard CD-playing stereo offers reasonable sound in town, but quickly gets overwhelmed by roadnoise at higher speeds.

RUNNING COSTS

Low insurance costs should help the Fox appeal strongly to young drivers - although the fuel economy is worse than that of comparable rivals.

VALUE FOR MONEY

Respectable standard kit on basic version means the Fox offers strong value compared to rivals, although buyers will do without much in the way of toys. Aircon is an expensive option.

ENVIRONMENT

In Brazil, where it comes from, it runs on sugar cane biofuel. In Europe, running on petrol it is absolutely dreadful, being miles behind any direct competitor.

This review has been tagged with: Volkswagen | Volkswagen Fox

There are 2 variants of the Fox

Fox variants Price (£) Fuel type Engine
size (cc)
CO2 emission
(g/km)
1.2 3dr £7,795 1198 136
1.2 Urban Fox 3dr £8,530 1198 136
 

Average

3_5

User reviews (4)

Leave a review

Rob
4

Nice look car

Report as inappropriate
Steve C
4

Yes, it's a bit plain but for those of us after an honest, decent small car you could do a lot worse than one of these. The 1.2 engine has an engaging character, and the car trundles along well with a comfortable ride and decent handling - certainly a lot more mature than the jittery 107/Aygo clan. It also copes on the motorway, but the real ace is the space inside - My wife's Urban Fox with sliding rear seats has transported large items that wouldn't fit through the hatch on my A3 Sportback - it really is impressively roomy. It is also gimmick free and manages to avoid looking as cheap as it is.

Report as inappropriate
Adrian C
1

Ive just been handed the keys as a Courtesy car whilst mines being repaired. Its a brand spanker and what can i say. Uncomfortable, Tinny No power, Basic. I think the loaner is a 1.2. I really dont want to drive it so i think i will get my push bike out untill its time for it to go back. I cant think of anything good to say. Have a look at the new Skoda super mini. It will be cheaper and cant be any worse.

Report as inappropriate
gar
4

cracking small car more grown up than the rest of cheap hatches had a corsa 1.2 wen x5 was getting service was worrst thing ever,

Report as inappropriate

Join Channel 5

Creating an account is free, will only take a few moments and will allow you to enjoy the full benefits of 5FWD and Channel 5:

  • Create lists of your most wanted and owned products
  • Leave article comments without having to re-enter your login details
  • Get updated with all the latest gadget and car news

Leave a comment

Please note that we will not expose your email, but we might use it to email you back. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.
* mandatory field

* Enter your rating:

Quick car search

Find a car review

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
See all